The CFTC's proposed amendments to Rule 40.11 (RIN 3038-AF65) would create a structured, three-step public-interest review for event contracts tied to gaming, war, terrorism, assassination, and similar activities. The public comment period closed today, 2026-07-27. Here is what the rule proposes, which contracts are at risk, and what the path to a final rule looks like.
RIN
3038-AF65
FR Citation
91 FR 35806
ANPRM Comments
3,500+
Review Period
90 days
Under the proposed rule, the CFTC would apply this sequence to any event contract that may involve an enumerated activity. All three steps must be satisfied before a contract can be blocked or conditioned.
Is it an event contract?
Assess whether the agreements, contracts, transactions, or swaps qualify as event contracts (based upon an occurrence, extent of an occurrence, or contingency).
Does it involve an enumerated activity?
Determine whether the event contracts involve an activity enumerated in the Special Rule (gaming, terrorism, assassination, war, or unlawful activity) or similar activity.
Is it affirmatively against the public interest?
If they involve such activity, undertake a public interest analysis and determine whether the event contract is affirmatively against the public interest.
Source: 91 FR 35806 — Federal Register
Risk tiers are based on the NPRM text and the enumerated activities in CEA §5c(c)(5)(C). “Review required” tiers reflect contract categories the NPRM identifies as disfavored — they are not automatically banned, but face heightened scrutiny in a finalized rule.
Category
Examples
Risk Tier
Gaming / Wagering
Direct gambling-style wagering, lottery-equivalent contracts
Terrorism
Contracts tied to occurrence or scale of a terrorist attack
Assassination
Contracts on an individual's death by targeted violence
War / Military Conflict
Contracts on initiation or outcome of armed conflicts
Unlawful Activity
Contracts on commission of crimes, drug trafficking outcomes
Sports — Player Injuries
Will [player] get injured this game? Severity of injury markets
Sports — Officiating
Was the call correct? How many penalties will be called?
Sports — Discrete In-Game Actions
Will [player] score next? Specific play-by-play event contracts
Pre-Collegiate Sports
High school or college game outcomes, player performance
Elections & Political Outcomes
Who wins the presidency, Senate seat, ballot measures
Economic Indicators
Fed rate decisions, CPI prints, GDP outcomes
Entertainment & Awards
Oscar winners, box office milestones, sports championship winners
Weather & Environment
Storm landfall, temperature records, hurricane categories
“Always banned” = CEA §5c(c)(5)(C) enumerated categories as proposed. “Review required” = NPRM disfavored categories subject to public-interest analysis. “Generally permitted” = outside enumerated activities under the proposed rule. Final classification depends on the rule as adopted.
CFTC Advisory — Release CSL 26-08 (July 24, 2026)
On July 24, 2026, the CFTC's Division of Market Oversight issued its second advisory of 2026 on self-certification practices. The agency warned that many exchanges have been submitting broad, template-style certifications without the required per-contract terms, settlement methodology, and compliance analysis.
“Broad, template-style certifications should not be submitted.”
— CFTC Release CSL 26-08, July 24, 2026
What the advisory requires: Each self-certification must include complete per-contract terms and conditions, settlement methodology, underlying commodity description, and a concise compliance analysis — not a single template covering open-ended permutations.
Under CEA Regulation 40.2, designated contract markets may still list event contracts without prior CFTC approval — as long as each self-certification includes complete per-contract terms, settlement methodology, source data description, and a concise compliance analysis.
Bundling multiple contract variations (different settlement sources, methodologies, or underlying events) into a single template certification. The CFTC said such filings prevent staff from reviewing manipulation controls, settlement reliability, and individual contract compliance.
Sources: CFTC Release CSL 26-08 (Jul 24, 2026) · CFTC Release 9193-26 (Mar 12, 2026)
Comment Period Closes — 2026-07-27
The public comment period closed July 27, 2026. CFTC staff begin reviewing submissions; the Commission may request additional comment, hold meetings, or revise the proposal before any final rule.
CFTC Staff Review
CFTC staff and commissioners review all submitted comments. The agency may hold public meetings, request additional comment, or issue a revised proposed rule before finalizing. The volume of comments — the ANPRM received 3,500+ — typically extends review timelines.
Final Rule (If Adopted)
If adopted, a final rule typically takes months to more than a year after the comment period closes, then takes effect on a date set in the Federal Register publication. Until a final rule is published in the Federal Register and takes effect, the current CEA §5c(c)(5)(C) framework applies.
Current Status
As of July 27, 2026 the NPRM comment deadline has passed. No final Rule 40.11 amendments have been adopted; existing CEA §5c(c)(5)(C) and staff advisories continue to apply.
Source: 91 FR 35806 — Federal Register
Regulatory Tracker
Live status of CFTC actions, state lawsuits, and federal bills.
CFTC vs. Michigan Standoff
How conflicting federal and state orders created a dual-authority crisis.
How to Comment on the NPRM
Step-by-step guide to submitting a comment that gets considered.
State-Level Regulatory Actions
Which states are suing, banning, or licensing prediction markets.
CFTC Enforcement History
Advisory history, insider-trading cases, and the Van Dyke prosecution.
Are Prediction Markets Legal?
State-by-state legality guide for traders.